UN Committee meetings
UNITED NATIONS
Press release
COMMITTEE
ON ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ADOPTS CONCLUSIONS ON REPORT OF TRINIDAD
AND TOBAGO
CERD
59th session
7 August 2001
Afternoon
Starts Consideration of Report of Sri
Lanka on Giving Effect to the
Provisions of the Convention
The
Committee was monitoring Sri Lanka's compliance with the provisions of the
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
Discrimination.
Introducing his country's report, Prasad Kariyawasam, Ambassador and Permanent
Representative of Sri Lanka to the United Nations Office at Geneva, said that
the Government emphasized the need for a new vision for Sri Lankan nationhood
embracing all ethnic communities on the basis of equality and partnership. That
policy envisaged the promotion of value systems necessary for the survival of
ethnic groups as distinct collective identities with dignity, while maintaining
the territorial integrity of the country, he said.
Mr.
Kariyawasam said that the policy of national integration intended to promote
harmonious multi-ethnic policy with a view to resolving ethnic issues that had
engulfed the country. However laudable the Government's efforts had been, it had
not been able to eliminate the ethnic and racial prejudice that tormented almost
every society in the world, he added.
Tang Chengyuan, the Committee Expert who served as country rapporteur to the
report of Sri Lanka, said that the domestic conflict would have been settled had
the policy of devolution of power to regions been implemented. If that had been
the case, the Tamil fighters would have not continued to struggle for the
creation of a separate state.
Mr. Tang further said that the Sri Lankan Government had participated in
international human rights fora, and had adopted several human rights
instruments, to which it should be commended; however, concerning article 4 of
the Convention on condemnation of racist propaganda, the Government had to take
more measures.
Other
Committee members also raised a number of questions on such issues as lack of
freedom of the press; the killing of individuals; political assassinations;
arbitrary detention; racial discrimination against minority groups; and
stateless persons of Indian origin, among other things.
In addition to Mr. Tang, the following Committee Experts also took part in the
debate: Michael E. Sherifis, Luis Valencia Rodriguez, Raghavan Vasudevan Pillai,
Regis de Gouttes, Gabriele Britz, Marc Boussuyt, Mario Jorge Yutzis and Patrick
Thornberry.
The
Sri Lankan delegation was also made up of G.B. Keerawella, Secretary to the
Ministry of Ethnic Affairs and National Integration; C.R. De Silva, Solicitor
General, Attorney-General's Department; S.S. Ganegama Arachchi, Counsellor,
Sumedha Ekanayake, Second Secretary, and Himalee Arunatilaka, Second Secretary,
Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka in Geneva.
Sri Lanka is among the 157 States parties to the Convention and as such it is
obligated to present periodic reports on how it was implementing the provisions
of the treaty.
The Committee will continue its consideration of the report of Sri Lanka when it
reconvenes at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, 8 August.
Report of Sri Lanka
The ninth periodic report, contained in document CERD/C/357/Add.3, says that the
report covers a critical period, 1994 to 1999, in the history of socio-political
institutions and ethnic relations in the country. It notes that the present
Government, which assumed office in 1994, has taken a definite and positive
stand and has pursued a proactive policy on the ethnic issue. During the last
ten years, unprecedented measures have been initiated to further strengthen
equality, social justice and dignity for the people of Sri Lanka. The Government
has pursued a 'one nation - one people' policy, which emphasizes the unity of
the country while recognizing its multi-cultural and multi-religious nature.
Sri Lanka is committed to building a society where all communities can live in
safety and security, where human dignity is valued and equality of treatment is
an accepted norm of public life, the report says. Effort is continuously made to
ensure that all communities have the space to express their identity, including
the right to enjoy their own culture, profess and practise their own religion
and nurture and promote their own language. From the time of independence,
various legislative, judicial and administrative measures have been adopted by
successive governments to address the demands of minority communities. The
present Government has taken steps to identify the remaining elements which may
contribute to perceptions of discrimination between people on the basis of race,
with a view to eradicating them and to creating an environment for harmonious
ethnic relations within society.
The resumption of a dialogue between the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)
and the Government of Sri Lanka to find a durable solution to the issues
affecting the North and the East was accorded priority consideration by the
Government, the report states. Between October 1994 and April 1995 four rounds
of peace talks were concluded between the Government and the LTTE. Despite the
positive responses of the Government to the new conditions put forward by the
LTTE, the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement was unilaterally violated by the
LTTE on 19 April 1995.
Presentation of Sri Lankan Report
PRASAD KARIYAWASAM, Ambassador and Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the
United Nations Office at Geneva, recalled that the duration covered under the
report, 1994-1999, was a period that had ushered landmark achievements in the
country's history. Several progressive socio-political institutions had been
created, as well as the promotion of ethnic relations in the country. Several
measures were taken by the present Government to set up many institutional
mechanisms for the promotion and protection of human rights. In addition, the
Government also ratified and acceded to several international human rights
treaties coupled with active cooperation with many United Nations human rights
mechanisms.
Mr. Kariyawasam said that authorities in Sri Lanka appreciated the valuable role
of the non-government organizations (NGOs) pertaining to promotion and
protection of human rights. Nationality and internationally recognized NGOs in
Sri Lanka actively campaigned on many issues including human rights,
environmental and development issues. There were several hundred such NGOs
active in Sri Lanka and they had the freedom and ability to be critical of the
Government while bringing the executive under vigorous scrutiny.
Sri Lanka was the home for several ethnic and religious communities, Mr.
Kariyawasam continued to say, adding that they all had equal rights and
fundamental freedoms, which were enshrined in the Constitution and were
justiciable in the highest court in the land. Sri Lanka's commitment to
multi-ethnicity and unity in diversity was reflected in the country's ethnic
affairs policy. The People's Alliance Government that came to power in 1994
recognized the importance of an ethnic affairs policy as a key area in the
public policy domain.
Mr. Kariyawasam further said that the Government emphasized the need for a new
vision for Sri Lankan nationhood embracing all ethnic communities for Sri Lanka
on the basis of equality and partnership. That policy envisaged the promotion of
value systems necessary for the survival of ethnic groups as distinct collective
identities with dignity, while maintaining the territorial integrity of the
country. The policy of national integration intended to promote harmonious
multi-ethnic policy with a view to resolving ethnic issues that had engulfed the
country. However laudable the Government's efforts had been, it had not been
able to eliminate the ethnic and racial prejudice that bedevilled almost every
society in the world.
Mr. Kariyawasam said that for the past
two decades, his country had suffered immensely due to an armed conflict with a
terrorist organization whose primary objective was the creation of a mono ethnic
separate country. Their violence and intolerance was completely contrary to
the general ethics of the country and in fact that of the global village. The
extreme violence and terrorism perpetuated by the group called Liberation Tigers
of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in the past decade had had a devastating impact on the
society as a whole. The group had assassinated several democratic political
leaders belonging to all communities. Recently, the President of the country had
miraculously escaped an assassination attempt during an election campaign when
she was running for re-election. Sri Lankan authorities, nevertheless,
recognized the importance of dialogue and reconciliation for long-term and
sustained ethnic harmony and for promotion and protection of human rights for
all communities in the country, Mr. Kariyawasam said. The Government of Sri
Lanka had agreed with LTTE suggestion to obtain the good office of the
Government of Norway as a facilitator to commence a dialogue to find an
acceptable solution to all the communities in Sri Lanka with a view to halting
the on-going armed conflict. Despite such good intentions on the part of the
Government, as recently as last month, the LTTE had attacked the only
international airport in Sri Lanka.
In his conclusion, Mr. Kariyawasam said that notwithstanding such regular
provocations and acts of terrorism, the authorities had made every effort to
provide facilities and ensure protection of human rights of all citizens, in
particular those living in conflict prone regions such as northern and eastern
provinces of Sri Lanka.
Consideration of Report
TANG CHENGYUAN, the Committee Expert who served as country rapporteur to the
report of Sri Lanka, said that the country was a democratic republic. The
conflict in the country had led to racial tension, which in turn had created
hatred among racial groups. In fact, the Government had affirmed that it was not
pursuing a policy of racial discrimination despite the conflict.
The domestic conflict would have been
settled had the policy of devolution of power to regions been implemented, Mr.
Tang said. If that was the case, the Tamil fighters would not have continued to
struggle for the creation of a separate state.
The Sri Lankan Government had participated in international human rights fora,
and had adopted several human rights instruments, to which it should be
commended, Mr. Tang said. However, concerning article 4 of the Convention, on
condemnation of racist propaganda, the Government had to do more to penalize
those who had burned places of worship.
With regard to article 5 of the Convention on equality before the law, Mr. Tang
said that illegal detention had been prohibited and perpetrators had been
punished. However, both the Tamil and the State army had committed, in the name
of revenge, a number of illegal acts against the civilian population.
The law enforcement institutions were also affected by the authorities who
destabilized the situation, thus leading to extrajudicial executions, Mr. Tang
said quoting non-governmental organization (NGO) sources. The Tamil Tiger
fighters were also committing the same acts. There were unresolved cases of
disappearances by the Government of Sri Lanka. The occurrence of forced
disappearances had also continued.
The information supplied by the Sri Lankan organization for the Defence of
Democratic Rights indicated that persons were arrested in police stations for
lengthy periods, Mr. Tang said. At least 6,000 cases had been presented by the
Government of Sri Lanka to the Working Group on forced or involuntary
disappearances, which was among the Government's efforts.
A committee against illegal harassment and illegal arrests had been established
by presidential decree, which resolved several cases, Mr. Tang continued to say,
adding another committee had also been set up to monitor illegal detentions.
Mr. Tang said that the Government should continue its efforts in providing
relief aid to persons not only living under its control but also to those living
beyond its jurisdiction within the country, as it did now. Other Committee
members also said that the forthcoming constitutional reform, which was at
present before the parliamentary committee, should restate the principle of
racial equality and should affirm the prohibition of racial discrimination. The
major problem faced by the Government of Sri Lanka did not have only racial and
ethnic aspects but also had political considerations. People who worked in
plantations had been prevented from continuing their work and such issues should
be considered by the Government as the part of the fulfilment of the people's
economic, social and cultural rights. In addition, land rights issues to
indigenous peoples should be ensured in accordance with the Committee's General
Comment no. 23, which recommended to States parties to recognize the rights of
indigenous people to use, to possess and to live in communities in their own
lands.
It was also said that people of difference racial and linguistic origin were
obliged to attend court hearings in other languages other than their own. They
were also compelled to sign police findings without knowledge of their contents.
An Expert said that there were discrepancies between the information produced by
the report and the information provided by non-governmental organizations. The
NGOs information had indicated the existence of problems in the country,
particularly in the region of armed conflict. The state of emergency, which had
given special power to the armed forces, had been a focus of human rights
violations. Various other NGOs had also reported on acts of discrimination of
all sorts, including the administration of justice, against Tamil people. Many
of the plantation workers were stateless people who were used in situations
amounting to servitude.
Another Expert said that the report did
not deal with the main racial problem faced by the country at present. The
delegation was asked to give its views with regard to power sharing arrangement
with regions. To which ethnic group did offenders of human rights belong?
An Expert said that many Sri Lankans of
Tamil origin had been fleeing the country for Europe and America to seek asylum,
while many of them were taken to the Middle Eastern countries as workers. The
Expert wanted to know how many of the asylum-seekers had returned home after
their requests were rejected by the host countries. How did the Government
receive those returnees?
In a brief reply, the delegation, in reference to an Expert=s allusion of a
report that the Government was recruiting children in the army, said that the
Government of Sri Lanka did not recruit children below 18 years into the army.
The delegation said it was the LTTE that was recruiting children by force.
UNITED NATIONS
Press release
CERD
59th session
8 August 2001
Morning
Concludes Public Consideration of
Report of Sri Lanka
Also this morning, the Committee concluded its public consideration of a report
presented by the Government of Sri Lanka after hearing the response of the
delegation to questions raised yesterday.
Responding to allegations made by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) of acts
of torture committed by law enforcement officers, the Sri Lanka delegation said
that while there had been incidents of such offences, the perpetrators had not
enjoyed any immunity. It had been found that 28,000 persons had gone missing
from 1 January 1988 to 31 December 1990. At present, 1,438 cases had been
examined and criminal action had been instituted against 591 police officers and
armed personnel. Among the missing persons, 16,800 were Sinhalese who had
disappeared during an ultra Marxist insurrection in the non-Tamil areas, the
delegation added.
Tang Chengyuan, the Committee Expert who acted as country rapporteur to the
report of Sri Lanka, said in preliminary remarks that the Government had adopted
huge measures towards the resolution of the armed conflict and was also
investigating allegations of human rights violations, including cases of
disappearances; the role of Norway should be appreciated for its efforts to find
a peaceful solution to the conflict with the Liberation of Tamil Tigers Eelam (LTTE).
The
Committee will issue its concluding observations and recommendations on the
report of Sri Lanka before the end of its three-week session which ends on 17
August.
Participating in the debate were Committee Experts Michael E. Sherifis, Mario
Jorge Yutzis, Regis de Gouttes, Mahmoud Aboul-Nasr, Raghavan Vasudevan Pillai,
Ion Diaconu, Marc Boussuyt, Partick Thornberry, Yuri A. Reshetov, Francois
Lonseny Fall and Gabriele Britz.
Sri Lanka is among the 157 States parties to the Convention and as such it is
obligated to present periodic reports to the Committee on how it was
implementing the provisions of the human-rights instrument.
Response by Sri Lanka
In response to queries raised by Committee Experts yesterday afternoon, the
members of the delegation said that the Government had made efforts to negotiate
peace with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). Despite the LTTE's
intransigence and provocative acts, the Government had presented proposals for a
devolution of power that could form the basis for further discussions with all
parties concerned. Those proposals were brought to the attention of the LTTE
previously. The Government believed in the need for a political solution,
emphasizing clearly that there was no military solution for the ongoing conflict
in the country. The facilitation efforts by the Government of Norway would
continue and Sri Lanka hoped that the result would be a peaceful solution.
The delegation said that the commission
on human rights had the right to inquire into violations of human rights
complaints alleged to be committed by any person, including public authorities.
It was also empowered to investigate any abuse of individual rights by police
officials. Offenses committed by public officers were punished; and no
perpetrator was left unpunished. The Government was not willing to tolerate any
form of human rights violation committed particularly by security forces
personnel and police officers. Whenever such incidents had occurred, prompt
investigations had been conducted and perpetrators had been prosecuted.
In application of article 4 of the Convention on the condemnation of racial
superiority, the delegation said that the commission of acts of violence or
racial or communal disharmony could attract an imposition of a minimum mandatory
sentence of five years, which could be extended up to 20 years.
Responding to allegations made by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) of acts
of torture committed by law enforcement officers, the delegation said that while
there had been such offences, the perpetrators had not enjoyed any immunity. The
Government had appointed three zonal commissions of inquiry to inquire into the
disappearance of persons from 1 January 1988 to 31 December 1990. It had found
that 28,000 persons had gone missing during those years. In addition, a special
unit had been set up on missing persons at the Attorney-General's Department to
monitor the investigations and to evaluate the evidence. At present, 1,438 cases
had been examined and criminal action had been instituted against 591 police
officers and armed personnel. Among the missing persons, 16,800 were Sinhalese
who had disappeared during an ultra Marxist insurrection in the non-Tamil areas.
Concerning acts of torture, the delegation said that at present eight
indictments had been referred to the high court and decisions had been taken on
four of the cases. In addition, investigations were being conducted by police
with respect to a number of cases and those investigations were expected to be
concluded by the end of the year.
Further, police were conducting investigations into the disappearances of 150
Tamil persons from the Northern province, the delegation said. The investigation
of 134 cases had been completed after recording statements by witnesses. Such
actions militated against the assertion of immunity for law enforcement officers
with respect to offences committed in the Tamil areas.
A
question was raised about the justiciability of the infringement of fundamental
rights by judicial action in respect of criminal proceeding in the proposed
constitution, to which the delegation said that the proposal enshrined the
fundamental right for a person charged to have his or her case tried without
undue delay by a competent court.
Regrading the recording of statements of Tamil suspects, the delegation said
that no statement made by any person to a police officer was admissible as
evidence. However, the prevention of terrorism act provided an exception where a
confession recorded by an officer of the higher rank was admissible.
Interpretation service was available to persons not conversant with
investigating officers.
A question was raised about the killing of 27 persons at a rehabilitation centre,
to which the delegation said that within a few hours of the incident, the
Government had immediately ordered an investigation and statements of more than
200 witnesses and 47 suspects had been recorded.
The Government of Sri Lanka was ready to enter into a political dialogue with
the LTTE within the context of national unity, the delegation said. It was also
ready to make arrangements for power sharing under the new constitutional
concession.
TANG CHENGYUAN, the Committee Expert who acted as country rapporteur to the
report of Sri Lanka, said in preliminary remarks that the report and the
delegation's attitude in responding to the Committee's questions were honest.
The Committee was now clear on how the State party was implementing the
provisions of the Convention. The impediments to the full implementation of the
Convention were also known to the Committee. The country was not free from
problems.
The Government had adopted huge measures towards the resolution of the armed
conflict, Mr. Tang said. It was also investigating allegations of human rights
violations, including cases of disappearances. The role of Norway should be
appreciated for its efforts to find a peaceful solution to the conflict
involving the LTTE. The Government attached great importance to bilingual
education; and other efforts in improving the situation should also be
appreciated.
MICHAEL E. SHERIFIS, the Committee Chairperson, said that the delegation had
admitted the problems faced by the Government and had expressed the
determination of the authorities to seek solutions to the problems and to bring
peace in the country.